2024, October 21 ~ Job 38:1-7,34-41; Isaiah 53:4-12; Hebrews 5:1-10; Mark 10:35-45
TODAY’S READINGS IN CONTEXT
OCTOBER 20, 2024
During this Pentecost Season, there are two “Tracks” of Scriptures that are offered, and congregations may choose which Track they will follow. The first two readings presented are the readings from Tracks 1 and 2, respectively. The last two readings are the same in both Tracks.
Job 38:1-7, 34-41
Reading
1 The LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind:
2 “Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?
3 Gird up your loins like a man, I will question you, and you shall declare to me.
4 “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell me if you have understanding.
5 Who determined its measurements—surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it?
6 On what were its bases sunk, or who laid its cornerstone
7 when the morning stars sang together and all the heavenly beings shouted for joy?
34 “Can you lift up your voice to the clouds, so that a flood of waters may cover you?
35 Can you send forth lightnings, so that they may go and say to you, ‘Here we are’?
36 Who has put wisdom in the inward parts, or given understanding to the mind?
37 Who has the wisdom to number the clouds? Or who can tilt the waterskins of the heavens,
38 when the dust runs into a mass and the clods cling together?
39 “Can you hunt the prey for the lion, or satisfy the appetite of the young lions,
40 when they crouch in their dens, or lie in wait in their covert?
41 Who provides for the raven its prey, when its young ones cry to God, and wander about for lack of food?”
Commentary
The Book of Job is a unique poetic story in the Hebrew Scriptures. Job was presented as a righteous person (in right relation with God and others) and as a non-Jew living in the land of Uz (somewhere in what is now Saudi Arabia).
Its authors are anonymous (generally referred to as “Poet-Job”) and the story contains multiple linguistic and stylistic forms. Accordingly, scholars conclude that the story is an ancient one that was supplemented by multiple authors between the 7th and the 4th Centuries BCE. The book contains numerous allusions to mythological traditions known throughout the Middle East but does not make specific references to Israelite legal or historical traditions. The characters do refer to themes found in the Psalms and Proverbs.
In the opening two chapters, Job was introduced and his good fortune was enumerated. The Satan (the “adversary” or the “accuser”) – not the post-First Century name of the devil) made (in effect) a wager with God that Job was righteous only because Job had health, children, and riches. The Satan (ha-satan in Hebrew) bet God that Job would curse God if he lost his family, health, and wealth. The Satan took everything from Job, but Job did not curse God.
Ha-Satan then upped the ante and asked the LORD to be allowed to inflict harm to Job’s body. YHWH told ha-Satan that he could not take Job’s life, and the Satan caused Job to have sores all over his body. Although Job’s wife encouraged Job to curse God and die, he persisted in his faithfulness.
Three of Job’s friends came to “comfort” him and sat with him for seven days in silence (2:11-13). Job then spoke an extended lament and wished he had never been born and prayed for his own death (Chapter 3).
Chapters 4 through 22 are a dialogue between Job and his friends in which his friends relied on the typical Deuteronomic thought that Job’s deprivations must be the result of a sin by him or his forebears. Job denied this reasoning and denied that he had engaged in wrongdoing.
Contrary to the claim in the KJV translation of Jas. 5:11, Job was anything but “patient.” He “endured,” was steadfast and in some respects, defiant.
In last week’s reading, Job asked for someone to judge whether a God who caused a person to suffer is really a just God and worthy to be called “God.” He asked to confront God face-to-face.
In today’s reading, YHWH appeared to Job out of a whirlwind, and The New Oxford Annotated Bible points out that theophanies (appearances by the Divine in Scripture) are typically accompanied by a storm. The LORD overwhelmed Job by using rhetorical questions that point out all that Job did not know, including the creation of the world and the intricacies of the animal world.
Today’s reading is 14 verses of a diatribe that continued for four chapters, and includes two lengthy speeches by YHWH. The Jewish Study Bible points out that God’s speech contended that Job also had no right to demand explanations. In the text, God did not give Job a straight answer to his demand for a hearing.
The JSB goes on to say that neither God nor the book of Job provides an answer to the question why bad things happen to good people. Instead, The JSB editorializes: “The conclusion may be that we cannot know the ways of God, and that to insist that God act in a certain way is to limit God’s great power and knowledge. The effect of God’s speech is to put Job in his place, to awe him with God’s might.”
In the last Chapter in the Book (next week’s reading), God criticized the positions taken by Job’s friends that suffering results from some prior immoral act of the sufferer. In a later-added Epilogue, Job’s riches were restored and he fathered a new family.
Isaiah 53:4-12
Reading
4 Surely, he has borne our infirmities and carried our diseases; yet we accounted him stricken, struck down by God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the punishment that made us whole, and by his bruises we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have all turned to our own way, and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.
8 By a perversion of justice he was taken away. Who could have imagined his future? For he was cut off from the land of the living, stricken for the transgression of my people.
9 They made his grave with the wicked and his tomb with the rich, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth.
10 Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him with pain. When you make his life an offering for sin, he shall see his offspring, and shall prolong his days; through him the will of the LORD shall prosper.
11 Out of his anguish he shall see light; he shall find satisfaction through his knowledge. The righteous one, my servant, shall make many righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore I will allot him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong, because he poured out himself to death and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors.
Commentary
The Book of Isaiah is a composite of writings from three distinct periods in Israel’s history. Chapters 1-39 are called “First Isaiah” and called for Jerusalem to repent in the 20 years before Jerusalem was under siege by the Assyrians in 701 BCE. “Second Isaiah” is Chapters 40 to 55 and brought hope to the Judeans during the Exile in Babylon (587 to 539 BCE) by telling them they had suffered enough and would return to Jerusalem. “Third Isaiah” is Chapters 56 to 66 and, for the most part, gave encouragement to Judeans who returned to Jerusalem (which had been largely destroyed by the Babylonians in 587 BCE) after the Exile.
Today’s reading is part of Second Isaiah and is one of the “Suffering Servant” songs, the longest of which is Isaiah 52:13 to 53:12. The identity of the “Suffering Servant” is sometimes understood as the prophet Isaiah himself, but is more commonly is seen as Judea itself, whose suffering in the Exile (as the servant of YHWH) would lead to vindication by YHWH in the restoration to Jerusalem after 539 BCE.
The NOAB notes that “the servant’s sufferings and the violence inflicted on him were caused by the sins of others [v.5] and make atonement for sin.” “Unlike Jeremiah and Job, the servant suffered in silence.”
The JSB observes that in verses 11b-12, the LORD described the vindication of his servant and notes: “Either he [the servant] is saved from a fate like death, or he is actually described as being resurrected. In the latter case, his resurrection is probably a metaphor for the renewal of the nation at the end of the exile.”
The author of the Gospel According to Mark used many of the Suffering Servant themes to describe the sufferings of Jesus of Nazareth and for the representation that “the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:45)
Hebrews 5:1-10
Reading
1 Every high priest chosen from among mortals is put in charge of things pertaining to God on their behalf, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins. 2 He is able to deal gently with the ignorant and wayward since he himself is subject to weakness; 3 and because of this he must offer sacrifice for his own sins as well as for those of the people. 4 And one does not presume to take this honor, but takes it only when called by God, just as Aaron was.
5 So also Christ did not glorify himself in becoming a high priest but was appointed by the one who said to him, “You are my Son, today I have begotten you”; 6 as he says also in another place, “You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek.”
7 In the days of his flesh, Jesus offered up prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears, to the one who was able to save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission. 8 Although he was a Son, he learned obedience through what he suffered; 9 and having been made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him, 10 having been designated by God a high priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
Commentary
The Letter to the Hebrews was an anonymous sermon addressed to both Jewish and Gentile Jesus Followers which urged them to maintain their Faith in the face of persecution.
Although the Letter to the Hebrews is sometimes attributed to Paul, most scholars agree that it was written some time after Paul’s death in 63 CE, but before 100 CE. The letter introduced a number of important theological themes. The first four chapters explored the word of God spoken through the Son.
The Jewish Annotated New Testament observes that Hebrews has a Platonic philosophical orientation resembling that of Philo of Alexandria and that it contains the New Testament’s most sophisticated Greek.
The NOAB and The JANT agree that the author sought to ground his arguments in scripture (using the Septuagint) to argue that Jesus is superior to the Jewish traditions. The JANT states: “Hebrews offers a distinct and elevated Christology. As the Son of God, Jesus is superior to all other beings, including angels — he is uncreated, immortal, and permanent. He is also superior to all biblical heroes, including Moses and Abraham, as well as institutions like the Levitical priesthood. As both perfect sacrifice and heavenly priest who intercedes for humans, Jesus supersedes the Jewish sacrificial system, rendering it obsolete.”
The JANT continues: “Because Hebrews argues for Jesus’ superiority over all else and the obsolescence of the covenant God made with Moses at Mount Sinai, it expresses what scholars call supersessionist theology. Supersessionism is the idea that Christ’s entry into human history replaces all that has come before, including God’s unique covenant bond with Israel. The same idea is sometimes referred to as rejection/replacement theology.”
The author interpreted the life, death, and heavenly role of Jesus through the category of the “high priest’ who perfected the ancient sacrificial system of Judaism (which ended when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE).
The Letter emphasized that Jesus (as high priest) was able to sympathize with our weaknesses because he (as a human) had been tested as we are (v.2). The presentation of Jesus as high priest in the Letter to the Hebrews is unique in the Christian Scriptures and reflected the continuing process in early Christianity of developing images to describe who and what Jesus of Nazareth was (and is). The JANT points out that in the First Century, the high priest was chosen by Roman authorities and served at their pleasure.
The quote in verse 5 (“You are my son”) is taken from Psalm 2:7, a psalm that is interpreted as relating to David and is seen as a coronation ode. The quote in verse 6 (“You are a priest forever”) is taken from Psalm 110:4 and is also regarded as applying to David. As seen in 2 Samuel 6 and 8, David sometimes assumed the role of a priest, and in 1 Kings 3:4, Solomon offered sacrifice at Gibeon.
The High Priest Melchizedek (v.6) appears only in Genesis 14 where he was identified as the King of Salem (an early name for Jerusalem). As a High Priest, Melchizedek offered bread and wine as a sacrifice and blessed Abram (before his name was changed to Abraham). The JANT points out that there was no special priestly branch known as “the Order of Melchizedek” and that the “Order” includes only Melchizedek and Jesus. The NOAB points out that the theme of Jesus the Christ as a High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek is expanded in Chapter 7 of the Letter.
The JANT observes that the idea of learning obedience through suffering (v.8) is found in 2 and 4 Maccabees, and that being made perfect through suffering (v.9) and as a way to atone for others was a prominent theme in 4 Maccabees, “an early Jewish text that became popular in Christian circles.”
Mark 10:35-45
Reading
35 James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came forward to Jesus and said to him, “Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.” 36 And he said to them, “What is it you want me to do for you?” 37 And they said to him, “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.” 38 But Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink or be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?” 39 They replied, “We are able.” Then Jesus said to them, “The cup that I drink you will drink; and with the baptism with which I am baptized, you will be baptized; 40 but to sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared.”
41 When the ten heard this, they began to be angry with James and John. 42 So Jesus called them and said to them, “You know that among the Gentiles those whom they recognize as their rulers lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. 43 But it is not so among you; but whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, 44 and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all. 45 For the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.”
Commentary
The Gospel According to Mark was the first Gospel that was written and is usually dated to the time around the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Mark’s Gospel is the shortest gospel and forms the core for the Gospels According to Matthew and Luke (both of which were written around 85 CE). Over 50% of the material in those two Gospels is based on Mark. Because these three Gospels follow similar chronologies of Jesus’ life and death, they are called “Synoptic Gospels” for the Greek words meaning “Same Look/View.”
Today’s reading follows Jesus’ telling “the twelve” (v.32) for the third time that the Son of Man would be handed over to the chief priests and scribes and would be killed and after three days would rise again (v.34).
The NOAB observes that James and John’s request (v.37) showed that they either rejected or misunderstood Jesus’ mission and what Jesus had told them. The “cup” is the suffering that will be part of being a Jesus Follower, and in verses 42 to 44, Jesus expressed a view that, in contrast to the imperial practices of the Gentiles, Jesus Followers are called to be “servants” or “slaves.” The New Jerome Biblical Commentary notes that words used in the text are diakonos (literally, one who waits on tables) and doulos, an even humbler word than diakonos.
The NJBC notes: “In Matt 20:20, their [James’ and John’s] mother makes the request – probably part of Matthew’s attempt to tone down Mark’s negative portrait of the disciples.”
That the Son of Man would be a “ransom for many” (v.45) is derived from the Suffering Servant Songs of Isaiah 52-53. There are numerous theories about what these words mean. In the First Century (until 70 CE when the Temple was destroyed), animal sacrifice was being performed at the Temple. These sacrifices were offered for many different purposes – to offer thanksgiving to God, to atone for sins, and for establishing community among those offering the sacrifice.
In Christianity, there are different understandings of the meaning of the Crucifixion – that it was an example for Christians to be ready to offer themselves as a sacrifice for others and suffer by following Jesus’ example of being a servant to others by loving God and our neighbor; or that he died “for” our sins in the sense that Jesus died “because” of the sins which we share with the Roman Authorities and the Jewish Leaders who rejected his life and message.
In the 11th Century CE, Anselm of Canterbury developed the theory of “Substitutionary Atonement “ in which Jesus (as a perfect sacrifice) was seen as a “stand in” or substitute for all persons and that Jesus died to “square the account” with a God who was angry with humans because of Adam’s sin. This understanding of God as an angry God who demanded the killing of his Son is considered by many as inconsistent with an understanding of a God of Love who is merciful and forgiving.